Documented Outcomes
The matters below are representative documented results. Review the trust center for how we publish claims and the attorney profile for practice focus.
Civil Rights
A federal jury returned a $126 million verdict in this Oklahoma § 1983 action in April 2026.
Civil Rights
Western District of Oklahoma
Representative documented result
Civil Rights
Simms v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority — $2 Million Jury Verdict
A federal jury returned a $2 million verdict against the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority in this § 1983 in-custody death action. Trial evidence included records indicating that five of six required cell checks were missed before the detainee was found unresponsive, and the verdict addressed the institutional deliberate-indifference claim.
Read Full Case Details →
Civil Rights
Jail Medical Neglect - Diabetes
Custody-death matter involving diabetic ketoacidosis and allegations of delayed emergency care.
Read Full Case Details →These representative matters provide context about the categories of cases the firm has handled. Every case is unique, and past outcomes do not guarantee future results. Use them to identify proof that may need attorney review in a serious injury, fatal loss, civil-rights, or disputed-liability matter.
Serious Injury & Fatal Loss
Major injury, fatal loss, trucking, motorcycle, and premises outcomes.
Truck Crashes
Commercial vehicle outcomes involving trucking proof and severe harm.
Wrongful Death
Fatal injury matters and family-loss proof.
Catastrophic Injury
Severe injury records, future losses, and disputed responsibility.
Motorcycle Wrecks
Rider injury matters and defense blame issues.
Premises Liability
Dangerous-property cases involving catastrophic harm.
How To Read These Results
If you are evaluating a catastrophic injury, wrongful death, or civil-rights matter, use the trust center to review how the firm approaches records, proof, and attorney review before you submit a case.
A federal jury returned a $126 million verdict in this Oklahoma § 1983 action in April 2026.
A federal jury returned a $2 million verdict against the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority in this § 1983 in-custody death action. Trial evidence included records indicating that five of six required cell checks were missed before the detainee was found unresponsive, and the verdict addressed the institutional deliberate-indifference claim.
Custody-death matter involving diabetic ketoacidosis and allegations of delayed emergency care.
Construction-injury matter arising after a dump truck contacted an overhead power line and a worker suffered severe burns.
Wrongful death matter involving an infant death, disputed evidence, and a coverage dispute.
Civil-rights matter in which reconstruction evidence was used to evaluate conflicting accounts of a police shooting.
Rear-end trucking collision matter involving driver-qualification and disputed medical-qualification issues.
Custody-death matter involving reported signs of distress, a possible mental-health crisis, and disputed monitoring and response.
Commercial-truck collision matter involving disputed responsibility among corporate defendants.
Trucking collision matter involving a disputed lane maneuver and a prior-condition defense.
Civil-rights matter involving a fatal encounter and records of prior complaints and discipline issues.
Custody death matter involving prone restraint and a disputed cause-of-death theory.
Motorcycle crash resulting in catastrophic injury and a policy-limits recovery.
Fatal ladder-fall matter that included a coverage dispute.
Custody-death matter involving disputed monitoring and an evidence-preservation issue concerning video footage.
*Disclaimer: The results listed above are not a guarantee of future outcomes. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits. Some amounts represent the total settlement for all parties. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Share the basic facts, location, injuries, and available records. The firm uses the submitted information to check for conflicts and decide whether a follow-up conversation is appropriate.
Share enough information for a conflict check and preliminary review. Submitting the form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Start with the facts
A short summary of what happened and how to reach you is enough to begin.
Preserve photographs, communications, reports, medical records, and any available video. Do not delay a time-sensitive legal question while gathering everything.